Anker 735 vs. 715 Nano II 65W: Ports and Power Compared
By Buyer By Day · Updated November 3, 2026 · Researched comparison
The Anker 735 and Anker 715 Nano II can both provide up to 65W through a single USB-C port, but they solve different charging problems. The 735 A2667 has two USB-C ports and one USB-A port. The 715 A2663 has one USB-C port. Start by counting the devices you need to charge at the same time, then check the power each device needs.
Researched November 3, 2026. Recommendations and trade-offs are editorial judgments based on published specifications, not hands-on testing. Some links are affiliate links: we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Check exact model, seller, availability, and current price before buying.
Choose the Anker 735 for several devices. Choose the Anker 715 for one USB-C device at a time. Neither is a substitute for a laptop charger when your laptop requires more than 65W.
| Product | Best for | Main trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Anker 735 Charger — Nano II 65W, A2667 | A compatible laptop, phone, and accessory sharing one outlet. | With all three ports in use, output is split: 40W / 12W / 12W. |
| Anker 715 Charger — Nano II 65W, A2663 | One compatible USB-C laptop, tablet, or phone at a time. | Only one charging port; no simultaneous multi-device charging. |
The picks, with pros and cons
Anker 735 Charger — Nano II 65W, A2667
Best for: A compatible laptop, phone, and accessory sharing one outlet.
Two USB-C ports and one USB-A port make it a flexible option for a mixed set of devices.
+ Pros
- Three ports accommodate USB-C and USB-A cables.
- Up to 65W from a single USB-C port.
− Cons
- With all three ports in use, output is split: 40W / 12W / 12W.
- Charging cables are sold separately.
Choose the Anker 715 instead if you only need one USB-C port and do not need USB-A.
View Anker 715 Charger — Nano II 65W, A2663 on Amazon → · Read its pros & consAnker 715 Charger — Nano II 65W, A2663
Best for: One compatible USB-C laptop, tablet, or phone at a time.
A simple choice for a dedicated USB-C charging spot without unused extra ports.
+ Pros
- Up to 65W through its USB-C port.
- Foldable plug makes it easier to pack.
− Cons
- Only one charging port; no simultaneous multi-device charging.
- No USB-A port for older cables.
Choose the Anker 735 instead if you want to charge multiple devices from one outlet.
View Anker 735 Charger — Nano II 65W, A2667 on Amazon → · Read its pros & consHow to choose between these products
Anker 735 power sharing: what changes with three devices?
On the A2667 model compared here, the published three-port allocation is up to 40W on the first USB-C port, 12W on the second USB-C port, and 12W on USB-A. A 65W headline does not mean every connected device gets 65W. A laptop that normally uses the full single-port output will have less power available when other ports are occupied. Check the manufacturer’s allocation table for the particular combination you plan to use.
When the single-port Anker 715 makes more sense
The 715 removes the multi-device decision: there is one USB-C connection. It is a sensible candidate for a dedicated laptop charger or for someone who charges devices at different times. It is less useful if you need a laptop and phone plugged in simultaneously. Before buying another charger, check whether the one supplied with your laptop already covers your actual needs.
Check the model number, cable, and laptop requirement
Anker product names can be similar, so match the A2667 or A2663 model rather than relying on the number 735 or 715 alone. Confirm that your laptop accepts the supported USB-C charging profiles. If it needs more than 65W for your workload, consider another charger. Choose a cable that supports the required power; a USB-C connector alone does not establish the cable’s capabilities. This guide does not verify every laptop or phone combination.
Frequently asked questions
Can the Anker 735 deliver 65W to a laptop and charge a phone at the same time?
The full single-port 65W output is not maintained when multiple ports are used. Check the A2667 power-sharing table for your chosen port combination.
Does the Anker 715 have a USB-A port?
No. The A2663 Nano II model in this comparison has one USB-C port.
Is any USB-C cable suitable for 65W charging?
Check the cable’s power rating and your device’s charging requirements. Do not assume all cables with USB-C connectors support the same charging power.
We compared the intended use and published features of these specific models. Pros describe useful features; cons describe limitations and fit considerations inferred from those features. These are considered options, not a claim that every competing product was tested. Linked specifications may describe the current product generation; confirm the listing’s version.
- Anker 735 Charger — Nano II 65W, A2667 — manufacturer information
- Anker 715 Charger — Nano II 65W, A2663 — manufacturer information
The article header photograph is illustrative; photos inside product cards show the linked product model. Confirm the selected color on Amazon. We do not display live prices, ratings, or stock claims. Product pages and sellers can change.